Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 27 May 2013 00:14:08 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] uio.c: solve memory leak | From | Cong Ding <> |
| |
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Cong Ding <dinggnu@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:43:15PM +0100, Cong Ding wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 10:01:41PM +0100, Hans J. Koch wrote: >> > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 02:00:50PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >> > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 10:05:45PM +0100, Cong Ding wrote: >> > > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 2:21 AM, Hans J. Koch <hjk@hansjkoch.de> wrote: >> > > > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 05:40:00PM +0000, Cong Ding wrote: >> > > > >> In version 1, I forgot to modify the same bug in the first loop. >> > > > >> >> > > > >> we have to call kobject_put() to clean up the kobject after function >> > > > >> kobject_init(), kobject_add(), or kobject_uevent() is called. >> > > > >> >> > > > >> Signed-off-by: Cong Ding <dinggnu@gmail.com> >> > > > > >> > > > > Signed-off-by: "Hans J. Koch" <hjk@hansjkoch.de> >> > > > >> > > > Hi Greg, is this patch stil in the queue? >> > > >> > > Hans is queueing up UIO patches to send to me, I'm waiting for him to >> > > send them as I don't have any in my trees. >> > >> > I'll set that up tonight or tomorrow. Sorry, I was delayed by illness >> > and a lot of other work. >> Hi Hans, what's this going on? >> >> Thanks, - cong Hi Hans, it's another month. What's the progress of this patch? - cong
| |