lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [May]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH RFC v2] media: OF: add sync-on-green endpoint property
Hi,

On 05/25/2013 11:17 AM, Prabhakar Lad wrote:
>> From looking at Figure 8 "TVP7002 Application Example" in the TVP7002's
>> > datasheet
>> > ([2], p. 52) and your initial TVP7002 patches it looks like what you want is
>> > to
>> > specify polarity of the SOGOUT signal, so the processor that receives this
>> > signal
>> > can properly interpret it, is it correct ?
>> >
> Yes
>> > If so then wouldn't it be more appropriate to define e.g. 'sog-active'
>> > property
>> > and media bus flags:
>> > V4L2_MBUS_SYNC_ON_GREEN_ACTIVE_LOW
>> > V4L2_MBUS_SYNC_ON_GREEN_ACTIVE_HIGH
>> > ?
>> >
> Agreed I'll add these flags.
>
>> > And for synchronisation method on the analog part we could perhaps define
>> > 'component-sync' or similar property that would enumerate all possible
>> > synchronisation methods. We might as well use separate boolean properties,
>> > but I'm a bit concerned about the increasing number of properties that need
>> > to be parsed for each parallel video bus "endpoint".
>> >
> I am not clear on it can please elaborate more on this.

I thought about two possible options:

1. single property 'component-sync' or 'video-sync' that would have values:

#define VIDEO_SEPARATE_SYNC 0x01
#define VIDEO_COMPOSITE_SYNC 0x02
#define VIDEO_SYNC_ON_COMPOSITE 0x04
#define VIDEO_SYNC_ON_GREEN 0x08
#define VIDEO_SYNC_ON_LUMINANCE 0x10

And we could put these definitions into a separate header, e.g.
<dt-bindings/video-interfaces.h>

Then in a device tree source file one could have, e.g.

video-sync = <VIDEO_SYNC_ON_GREEN>;


2. Separate boolean property for each video sync type, e.g.

"video-composite-sync"
"video-sync-on-composite"
"video-sync-on-green"
"video-sync-on-luminance"

Separate sync, with separate VSYNC, HSYNC lines, would be the default, when
none of the above is specified and 'vsync-active', 'hsync-active' properties
are present.

However, I suppose the better would be to deduce the video synchronisation
method from the sync signal polarity flags. Then, for instance, when an
endpoint node contains "composite-sync-active" property the parser would
determine the "composite sync" synchronisation type is used.

Thus it might make sense to have only following integer properties (added
as needed):

composite-sync-active
sync-on-green-active
sync-on-comp-active
sync-on-luma-active

This would allow to specify polarity of each signal and at the same time
the parsing code could derive synchronisation type. A new field could be
added to struct v4l2_of_parallel_bus, e.g. sync_type and it would be filled
within v4l2_of_parse_endpoint().

What do you think ?


Thanks,
Sylwester


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-05-25 16:41    [W:0.354 / U:0.004 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site