lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [May]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/2] kdump/mmap: Fix mmap of /proc/vmcore for s390
On Fri, 24 May 2013 13:05:07 -0400
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 06:46:53PM +0200, Michael Holzheu wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 May 2013 11:28:49 -0400
> > Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 05:06:26PM +0200, Michael Holzheu wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > As /proc/vmcore is the most used and useful interface, I prefer
> > > that we swap memory and put that info in elf headers.
> > > For /dev/oldme, I don't mind if we leave it as it is. If somebody
> > > really cares, then I guess we need to write a new command line
> > > option which /dev/mem can parse and which tells it about swaps so
> > > that /dev/oldmem can map things correctly. (This is better than
> > > hardcoding things).
> >
> > Besides of the potential /dev/oldmem issue, I still do not
> > understand the option of doing the swap in the elf header. Looks
> > like I missed here a fundamental design point of kdump :(
> >
> > Is that done by specifying different virtual and physical addresses
> > in the ELF header?
>
> Nope. We keep the virtual to physical address mapping same. We just
> modify the p_offset in PT_LOAD elf header to represent where actually
> the memory is present physically. And when /proc/vmcore reads the
> data, it reads it from p_offset.
>
> IOW, p_offset and p_paddr will be different for swapped memory but
> should be same for memory which has not been swapped.

Hello Vivek,

Ok, now I got it :)

It worked for me by specifying a PT_LOAD with:

phdr->p_offset = OLDMEM_BASE;
phdr->p_vaddr = phdr->p_paddr = 0;
phdr->p_filesz = phdr->p_memsz = OLDMEM_SIZE;

Best Regards,
Michael




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-05-25 15:41    [W:0.318 / U:0.092 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site