[lkml]   [2013]   [May]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] Initial support for Allwinner's Security ID fuses
On 05/23/13 16:58, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 10:10:17AM +0200, Oliver Schinagl wrote:
>> Then, i'm not sure if the driver is the best for this to be loaded?
>> Maxime, what do you think? Personally I would feel more in having
>> this in the mach-sunxi/core.c bit, but then again, this is currently
>> a module and wouldn't be useful to have there. Maxime is far more
>> knowledgeable to answer that.
> Hmmm, I don't understand what you mean here. Could you explain what you
> have in mind?
I've thought about it a little, and don't think core.c is a good spot,
since the module will have to be loaded, or available there. And that's
really early.

So I guess, during probe, controlled by a parameter perhaps, load all 16
bytes into the random pool as Linus suggested?
> Thanks,
> Maxime

 \ /
  Last update: 2013-05-23 17:43    [W:0.075 / U:0.096 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site