Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 23 May 2013 16:43:17 +0200 | From | Oliver Schinagl <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] pwm: add sysfs interface |
| |
On 05/23/13 14:12, Lars Poeschel wrote: > Hi Oliver! > > As you are not the first one asking for the status of the pwm sysfs > interface I post my answer to the linux-kernel list in hope others will > benefit. > > On Thursday 23 May 2013 at 11:07:39, Oliver Schinagl wrote: >> Hi lars, >> >> I have trouble seeing if your patch has been applied yet to the kernel >> tree. I do see it in patchwork. >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2163151/ >> >> But don't see sysfs features in >> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/dri >> vers/pwm/core.c > > It is not merged and will never be. > >> If you haven't had time to take Greg's comments into account, would >> there be a possibility for you to correct those and re-submit? > > I already did resubmit an updated version taking Greg's comments into > account. You can find the thread here: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=136499756101273&w=2 > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2387391/ > > Also this version will not get merged into mainline. I have to do a v2 > according to Thierry's comments. I have planed to do it, but I will not > find the time during the next say 2 months. Ok, keep me updated. If in the meantime I find time, I'll take the next set of comments into account and re-submit it, with a CC to you. If you hear nothing, don't let that hold you back ;)
> >> If not, I'd be happy to pull your patch, fix and re-submit (giving you >> full credit of course). > > You're welcome! This is a community project. And there is nothing special > to pull or something. Just take the patch from patchwork and work on it. > >> Your sysfs driver feature is quite awesome and makes using PWM's quite >> cool, so that's definitely a good feature to have in the kernel. > > Thanks! > Thank you for your interest! > > Regards, > Lars >
| |