lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [May]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [ 027/102] x86, vm86: fix VM86 syscalls: use SYSCALL_DEFINEx(...)
At Fri, 17 May 2013 16:51:33 -0700,
Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 11:49:30PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 02:35:42PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > 3.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >
> > This is seriously wrong. For 3.9 you _need_ asmlinkage_protect() in that
> > thing; by the time when that went into the tree, mainline already had
> > it generated automatically by SYSCALL_DEFINE, so there was no point in
> > that part of patch - the switch to SYSCALL_DEFINE alone did the job.
> > For 3.9 it's very much needed; as the matter of fact, in 3.9 that commit
> > is a no-op in the form you took.
> >
> > We can grab all prereqs into 3.9-stable (there's not that much of those),
> > but that would be much more intrusive than the variant adding explicit
> > asmlinkage_protect() in those two syscalls.
>
> Ok, Alexander was saying something was off here.
>
> Can someone send me just the needed patch to get this working properly,
> and I will be glad to drop this one from the 3.9.x tree.

I'll be able to do it tomorrow if there'll be not available then.

Satoru


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-05-19 15:21    [W:0.183 / U:0.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site