lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [May]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: [PATCH v3] clocksource: add MVF600 pit timer support
Date


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Shawn Guo [mailto:shawn.guo@linaro.org]
>Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 11:21 AM
>To: Lu Jingchang-B35083
>Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
>john.stultz@linaro.org; tglx@linutronix.de; s.hauer@pengutronix.de
>Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] clocksource: add MVF600 pit timer support
>
>On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 03:08:54AM +0000, Lu Jingchang-B35083 wrote:
>> [Lu Jingchang-B35083]
>> I am not sure MVF5xx and MVF7xx have the same PIT block, if you have
>information that it is the same on other Vybrid SoCs, it is ok to change
>the driver name to mvf. Thanks!
>
>Even the PIT block on other Vybrid SoCs have differences from the one
>integrated on mvf600, we can handle them using device tree compatible
>string. And that's why we need to encode SoC name in compatible.
>
[Lu Jingchang-B35083]
Ok, I will rename the driver and the configure option, thanks!
>> [Lu Jingchang-B35083]
>> PIT0 and PIT1 can be chained to build a 64-bit timer, so PIT2 and PIT3
>are selected as the clocksource and clockevent device, and leave PIT0 and
>PIT1 unused for anyone else who needs them. Thanks!
>
>This could be an useful info to be in the comment.
>
[Lu Jingchang-B35083]
I will add a comment for this, thanks!




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-05-20 06:21    [W:0.042 / U:1.048 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site