[lkml]   [2013]   [May]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [Consult] Why need we call device_remove_file() firstly before call device_unregister() ?
On 05/18/2013 07:06 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> Hi,
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Chen Gang <> wrote:
>> Hello All:
>> I searched 'arch/*' and 'drivers/*' sub-directory, all of them are 'obey
>> this rule', even in device_unregister() itself, it also firstly calls
>> device_remove_file(), then call kobject_del().
>> But after read the related code (fs/sysfs/*, drivers/base/core.c), it
>> seems kobject_del() -> sysfs_remove_dir() which will release all related
>> things (can instead of device_remove_file()).
>> So in fact, we need not call device_remove_file() before call
>> device_unregister(), is it correct ?
> Looks it is correct but it is a bit implicit.

If really no other members reply within a week, we should treat your
opinion (or suggestion) as the final result conclusion within :-)

Chen Gang

Asianux Corporation

 \ /
  Last update: 2013-05-20 03:41    [W:3.044 / U:0.032 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site