lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [May]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [patch v3 -mm 1/3] memcg: integrate soft reclaim tighter with zone shrinking code
    On Thu 16-05-13 15:15:01, Tejun Heo wrote:
    > One more thing,
    >
    > Given that this is a rather significant behavior change, it probably
    > is a good idea to include the the benchmark results from the head
    > message?

    The testing I have done was on top of the complete series. The last
    patch should be irrelevant as I have tested the global reclaim but the
    second patch might still influence figures a tiny bit (we still do the
    soft limit tree thing). That's why I haven't pushed the numbers here.

    I can add that information if people prefer or just ask Andrew to squash
    the leader email into the first patch as he tend to do quite often in
    other cases as well.
    --
    Michal Hocko
    SUSE Labs


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2013-05-17 10:01    [W:4.084 / U:0.120 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site