Messages in this thread | | | From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/3] CPUFreq Fixes for 3.10-rc2 | Date | Thu, 16 May 2013 22:51:25 +0200 |
| |
On Thursday, May 16, 2013 02:09:46 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 16 May 2013 14:16, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > > On Thursday, May 16, 2013 10:39:55 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: > >> Hi Rafael, > > > > Hi, > > > >> Here are few more fixes for 3.10-rc2. > > > > I'm actually going to sent the for-rc2 request today, so these are for -rc3. > > Okay. No issues.
While I kind of understand why you want [3/3] to go into 3.10, I'm wondering about the other two patches. Why exactly are they needed now?
And speaking of patch [3/3], if you paste kernel logs into changelogs, please remove the time stamps (unless they are relevant to the problem being fixed).
Thanks, Rafael
-- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
| |