lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [May]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] efivarfs: Never return ENOENT from firmware again
From
Date
Hi Matt, 

於 一,2013-05-13 於 20:21 +0100,Matt Fleming 提到:
> On 05/10/2013 11:29 AM, Lingzhu Xiang wrote:
> > Previously in 1fa7e69 efi_status_to_err() translated firmware status
> > EFI_NOT_FOUND to -EIO instead of -ENOENT for efivarfs operations to
> > avoid confusion. After refactoring in e14ab23, it is also used in other
> > places where the translation may be unnecessary.
> >
> > So move the translation to efivarfs specific code. Also return EOF
> > for reading zero-length files, which is what users would expect.
> >
> > Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>
> > Cc: Lee, Chun-Yi <jlee@suse.com>
> > Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Lingzhu Xiang <lxiang@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > This is to be applied against mainline or Matt Fleming's chainsaw branch.
>
> Applied, thanks.
>
> FYI, I rebased my 'urgent' branch on v3.10-rc1, so your patch now
> applies there too.
>
>

I found the "[PATCH] x86, efi: initial the local variable of DataSize to
zero" lost in urgent branch, and it also didn't in Linus's v3.10-rc1.

Did this patch move to other branch?


Thanks a lot!
Joey Lee




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-05-14 07:21    [W:0.041 / U:1.816 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site