Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] efivarfs: Never return ENOENT from firmware again | From | joeyli <> | Date | Tue, 14 May 2013 12:36:37 +0800 |
| |
Hi Matt,
於 一,2013-05-13 於 20:21 +0100,Matt Fleming 提到: > On 05/10/2013 11:29 AM, Lingzhu Xiang wrote: > > Previously in 1fa7e69 efi_status_to_err() translated firmware status > > EFI_NOT_FOUND to -EIO instead of -ENOENT for efivarfs operations to > > avoid confusion. After refactoring in e14ab23, it is also used in other > > places where the translation may be unnecessary. > > > > So move the translation to efivarfs specific code. Also return EOF > > for reading zero-length files, which is what users would expect. > > > > Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@redhat.com> > > Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> > > Cc: Lee, Chun-Yi <jlee@suse.com> > > Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com> > > Signed-off-by: Lingzhu Xiang <lxiang@redhat.com> > > --- > > This is to be applied against mainline or Matt Fleming's chainsaw branch. > > Applied, thanks. > > FYI, I rebased my 'urgent' branch on v3.10-rc1, so your patch now > applies there too. > >
I found the "[PATCH] x86, efi: initial the local variable of DataSize to zero" lost in urgent branch, and it also didn't in Linus's v3.10-rc1.
Did this patch move to other branch?
Thanks a lot! Joey Lee
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |