lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [May]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] x86/xen: sync the CMOS RTC as well as the Xen wallclock
From
Date
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> wrote:

>On 05/14/2013 09:14 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 14.05.13 at 17:59, John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> wrote:
>>> On 05/14/2013 12:57 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>>> On 14.05.13 at 02:52, John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
>wrote:
>>>>> Honestly, it seems a little strange to me. If you're running as
>dom0,
>>>>> why does HYPERVISOR_dom0_op() not cause the hypervisor to set the
>cmos
>>>>> its virtualizing? This seems to mess with the proper
>virtualization
>>>>> layering.
>>>> Thy hypervisor tries to control as little system and peripheral
>devices
>>>> as possible, and the CMOS (including the clock) is among those not
>>>> controlled by it, but by Dom0.
>>> Huh. So what does calling HYPERVISOR_dom0_op do then?
>> Here it merely tells the hypervisor that the wall clock changed (so
>> it can propagate this on to DomU-s).
>
>Ok, I appreciate the explanation. Still waiting for acks on this one.
>
>thanks
>-john

Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk

Or Reviewed-by. Or John if you would like I can carry this in my branch for Linus.

Thought it might make sense to add the comment from Jan about the CMOS and the follow up explanation.
--
Sent from my Android phone. Please excuse my brevity.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-05-14 19:41    [W:0.052 / U:0.532 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site