Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 14 May 2013 10:15:33 -0600 | From | Stephen Warren <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH V1 resend] cpufreq: Raname index as data in cpufreq_frequency_table |
| |
On 05/14/2013 07:46 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: ... > This must address your concerns: > @Rafael: I have attached both patches now for you to apply. > > From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> > Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 19:08:50 +0530 > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: tegra: Remove irrelevant comment > > Tegra cpufreq driver doesn't use .index field of cpufreq_frequency_table and so > comment mentioning order of .index is irrelevant. Remove it.
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra-cpufreq.c
> -/* Frequency table index must be sequential starting at 0 */ > static struct cpufreq_frequency_table freq_table[] = { > { 0, 216000 }, > { 1, 312000 },
Does the .index/.data field even need to be filled in any more?
| |