lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [May]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4] extcon: Palmas Extcon Driver
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 02:48:53PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 May 2013 04:15 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> >On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 03:17:08PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> >>On Tuesday 07 May 2013 01:28 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> >
> >>>>The platform can provide it's own vbus control in which case this is
> >>>>not needed.
> >
> >>>So why is there no interaction with this external VBUS control and how
> >>>does the driver distinguish between that and an error getting the
> >>>regulator?
> >
> >>The platform specifies if it provides its own VBUS control by the dt
> >>property ti,no_control_vbus. So the driver will give an error only
> >>when *ti,no_control_vbus* is not set. Graeme?
> >
> >That doesn't answer the question about why there's no interaction with
> >the external control...
> >
>
> Graeme?
>
I already partially answered this, it was written for a SoC where VBUS
generation was in hardware on the SoC with no information.

I would say if nvidia/Laxman do not need this remove it, if someone ever
uses it then they can re-add it easy enough!

Graeme



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-05-14 12:41    [W:0.068 / U:0.136 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site