Messages in this thread | | | From | OGAWA Hirofumi <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] fs/fat: Use fat_msg() to replace printk() in __fat_fs_error() | Date | Mon, 13 May 2013 18:28:27 +0900 |
| |
Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> writes:
>>From 87141ec058aad35ac55bc7c3fc2eb378566a5a6a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> > Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 17:48:19 +0900 > Subject: [PATCH] fs/fat: Use fat_msg() to replace printk() in __fat_fs_error()
> - printk(KERN_ERR "FAT-fs (%s): error, %pV\n", sb->s_id, &vaf); > + fat_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "error, %pV", &vaf); > va_end(args);
I'm assuming nested "%pV" is works fine. If so,
Acked-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
> @@ -38,8 +38,7 @@ void __fat_fs_error(struct super_block *sb, int report, const char *fmt, ...) > panic("FAT-fs (%s): fs panic from previous error\n", sb->s_id); > else if (opts->errors == FAT_ERRORS_RO && !(sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY)) { > sb->s_flags |= MS_RDONLY; > - printk(KERN_ERR "FAT-fs (%s): Filesystem has been " > - "set read-only\n", sb->s_id); > + fat_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "Filesystem has been set read-only"); > } > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__fat_fs_error);
-- OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
| |