lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Apr]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Date
Subject[32/74] vt: synchronize_rcu() under spinlock is not nice...
3.2.43-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

commit e8cd81693bbbb15db57d3c9aa7dd90eda4842874 upstream.

vcs_poll_data_free() calls unregister_vt_notifier(), which calls
atomic_notifier_chain_unregister(), which calls synchronize_rcu().
Do it *after* we'd dropped ->f_lock.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
---
drivers/tty/vt/vc_screen.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/vt/vc_screen.c b/drivers/tty/vt/vc_screen.c
index e4ca345..d7799de 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/vt/vc_screen.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/vt/vc_screen.c
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ vcs_poll_data_free(struct vcs_poll_data *poll)
static struct vcs_poll_data *
vcs_poll_data_get(struct file *file)
{
- struct vcs_poll_data *poll = file->private_data;
+ struct vcs_poll_data *poll = file->private_data, *kill = NULL;

if (poll)
return poll;
@@ -122,10 +122,12 @@ vcs_poll_data_get(struct file *file)
file->private_data = poll;
} else {
/* someone else raced ahead of us */
- vcs_poll_data_free(poll);
+ kill = poll;
poll = file->private_data;
}
spin_unlock(&file->f_lock);
+ if (kill)
+ vcs_poll_data_free(kill);

return poll;
}


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-04-08 02:01    [W:0.161 / U:0.488 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site