| Date | Sun, 7 Apr 2013 21:51:12 +0200 | From | Michal Hocko <> | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] memcg: make memcg's life cycle the same as cgroup |
| |
On Sun 07-04-13 16:44:07, Li Zefan wrote: > Hi, > > I'm rebasing this patchset against latest linux-next, and it conflicts with > "[PATCH v2] memcg: debugging facility to access dangling memcgs." slightly. > > That is a debugging patch and will never be pushed into mainline, so should I > still base this patchset on that debugging patch?
Could you split CONFIG_MEMCG_DEBUG_ASYNC_DESTROY changes into a separate patch so that Andrew could put it on top of the mentioned patch?
> Also that patch needs update (and can be simplified) after this patchset: > - move memcg_dangling_add() to mem_cgroup_css_offline() > - remove memcg->memcg_name, and use cgroup_path() in mem_cgroup_dangling_read()?
Every improvement is welcome.
Thanks -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
|