Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 06 Apr 2013 18:14:25 +0800 | From | Wanlong Gao <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH V7 0/5] virtio-scsi multiqueue |
| |
On 04/06/2013 04:40 PM, James Bottomley wrote: > On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 16:55 +0800, Wanlong Gao wrote: >> On 03/28/2013 10:22 AM, Wanlong Gao wrote: >>> On 03/23/2013 07:28 PM, Wanlong Gao wrote: >>>> This series implements virtio-scsi queue steering, which gives >>>> performance improvements of up to 50% (measured both with QEMU and >>>> tcm_vhost backends). >>>> >>>> This version rebased on Rusty's virtio ring rework patches, which >>>> has already gone into virtio-next today. >>>> We hope this can go into virtio-next together with the virtio ring >>>> rework pathes. >>>> >>>> V7: respin to fix the patch apply error >>>> >>>> V6: rework "redo allocation of target data" (James) >>>> fix comments (Venkatesh) >>>> rebase to virtio-next >>>> >>>> V5: improving the grammar of 1/5 (Paolo) >>>> move the dropping of sg_elems to 'virtio-scsi: use virtqueue_add_sgs for command buffers'. (Asias) >>>> >>>> V4: rebase on virtio ring rework patches (rusty's pending-rebases branch) >>>> >>>> V3 and be found http://marc.info/?l=linux-virtualization&m=136067440717154&w=2 >>>> >>>> >>>> It would probably be easier to get it in via Rusty's tree >>>> because of the prerequisites. James, can we get your Acked-by? >>> >>> James, any thoughts for this version? >> >> Ping James.... > > Well, I haven't had time to look at anything other than the patch I > commented on. I'm happy with your fix, so you can add my acked by to > that one. Since it's going through the virtio tree, don't wait for me, > put it in and I'll make you fix up anything I find later that I'm > unhappy with.
Got it, thank you James.
Regards, Wanlong Gao
> > James > > >
| |