Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 30 Apr 2013 18:23:00 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [GIT PULL] scheduler changes for v3.10 |
| |
* Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 07:49:43AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:58 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > > Please pull the latest sched-core-for-linus git tree from: > > > > > > The main changes in this development cycle were: > > > > > > - full dynticks preparatory work by Frederic Weisbecker > > > > Why does this have the crappy cputime scaling overflow code, when we > > had a long thread about how to do it right *without* any 64-bit > > divides, including a quality-tested patch? > > > > This still has the garbage "div64_u64_rem()" crap which actually SLOWS > > DOWN 32-bit code even when not used (becuse it makes "div64_u64()" > > calculate it even when unnecessary. > > > > WTF happened here? I and others spent efforts so that we wouldn't need > > this kind of crap. > > I'm sorry, I was on vacations and has some other work to do, so I didn't > send patches in timely manner. I just posted them today.
Linus, would you like me to revert d9a3c9823a2e and re-send the pull request?
I intended to queue up Stanislaw's fixes in sched/urgent as the real solution, but they arrived earlier today and are too fresh.
Thanks,
Ingo
| |