Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 3 Apr 2013 09:08:11 -0700 | From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] sysfs: check if one entry has been removed before freeing |
| |
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 03:05:37PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman > <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 11:52:39AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> wrote: > >> > On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 10:58:23AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > >> > > >> > > diff --git a/fs/sysfs/dir.c b/fs/sysfs/dir.c > >> > > index 1bf016b..328ef9b 100644 > >> > > --- a/fs/sysfs/dir.c > >> > > +++ b/fs/sysfs/dir.c > >> > > @@ -268,6 +268,13 @@ void release_sysfs_dirent(struct sysfs_dirent * sd) > >> > > */ > >> > > parent_sd = sd->s_parent; > >> > > > >> > > + if (unlikely(!(sd->s_flags & SYSFS_FLAG_REMOVED))) { > >> > > + printk(KERN_ERR "sysfs: free using entry: %s/%s\n", > >> > > + parent_sd ? parent_sd->s_name : "", > >> > > + sd->s_name); > >> > > + BUG(); > >> > > + } > >> > > >> > Please use WARN instead of BUG. For an in-ram filesystem like > >> > sysfs, there's no real reason to lock-up the machine in this way > >> > making it harder to debug. > >> > >> If WARN is used, the freed memory will be allocated to other > >> kernel components, then sysfs may change the memory and cause > >> destruction, so maybe it is better to use BUG to stop kernel. > > > > No, it's never ok to call BUG(), sorry, please fix this. > > Sorry, could you explain it in a bit detail? IMO, it is really a bug > when code runs here, and there are much similar BUG_ON() > uses in current sysfs code too.
Then make it a WARN() call, like David said, to give us a chance to get the report from a user so we can fix it. If the machine crashes after that, fine, but hopefully we will get a oops report out of it.
greg k-h
| |