Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 25 Apr 2013 11:28:21 -0400 (EDT) | From | "Matt W. Benjamin" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] NFSv4: Use exponential backoff delay for Ni |
| |
Hi,
Just to clarify, the IBM delay behavior is not legal?
Matt
----- "Trond Myklebust" <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> wrote:
> > OK, then. Now all I need is actual motivation for changing the > existing > code other than handwaving arguments about "polling is better than > flat > waits". > What actual use cases are impacting us now, other than the AIX design > decision to force CLOSE to retry at least once before succeeding? >
-- Matt Benjamin The Linux Box 206 South Fifth Ave. Suite 150 Ann Arbor, MI 48104
http://linuxbox.com
tel. 734-761-4689 fax. 734-769-8938 cel. 734-216-5309
| |