lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Apr]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] NFSv4: Use exponential backoff delay for Ni
Hi,

Just to clarify, the IBM delay behavior is not legal?

Matt

----- "Trond Myklebust" <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> wrote:

>
> OK, then. Now all I need is actual motivation for changing the
> existing
> code other than handwaving arguments about "polling is better than
> flat
> waits".
> What actual use cases are impacting us now, other than the AIX design
> decision to force CLOSE to retry at least once before succeeding?
>


--
Matt Benjamin
The Linux Box
206 South Fifth Ave. Suite 150
Ann Arbor, MI 48104

http://linuxbox.com

tel. 734-761-4689
fax. 734-769-8938
cel. 734-216-5309


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-04-25 18:01    [W:0.068 / U:0.588 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site