Messages in this thread | | | From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH]drivers:acpi: Fix wrong parameter passed to memblock_reserve | Date | Tue, 23 Apr 2013 01:31:04 +0200 |
| |
On Friday, April 19, 2013 12:40:46 PM Wang YanQing wrote: > On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 07:47:38PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 6:44 PM, Wang YanQing <udknight@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > The parameter of memblock_reserve is start address, > > > and size, not address range. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Wang YanQing <udknight@gmail.com> > > > --- > > > drivers/acpi/osl.c | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/osl.c b/drivers/acpi/osl.c > > > index 586e7e9..bcb7a3b 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c > > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c > > > @@ -641,7 +641,7 @@ void __init acpi_initrd_override(void *data, size_t size) > > > * Both memblock_reserve and e820_add_region (via arch_reserve_mem_area) > > > * works fine. > > > */ > > > - memblock_reserve(acpi_tables_addr, acpi_tables_addr + all_tables_size); > > > + memblock_reserve(acpi_tables_addr, all_tables_size); > > > arch_reserve_mem_area(acpi_tables_addr, all_tables_size); > > > > Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> > > > > And it should go to stable for v3.8 > > Hi all, I think this fix should be merged before 3.9 is out, > it make no much sense to backport it for 3.9 later, but we don't have > much time before 3.9 is out, so... > > Thanks.
Applied, but please send ACPI patches (and especially urgent fixes) to linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org in the future.
Thanks, Rafael
-- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
| |