lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Apr]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: irq 16: nobody cared
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 10:01:36AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Hm, this really smells like a workaround: treating the symptom, not
> the cause.

Well, I just tested Takashi's add missing synchronize_irq() to the
suspend path of snd_hda_intel and it doesn't help.

So it could be an issue with this driver or only this hw/driver can
exacerbate RCU this much to trigger the spurious irq machinery.

> How can an increase in grace-periods break drivers and suspend? Do we
> understand exactly what happens there?

I'd rather look into Paul's direction here. :)

> If we do, can we fix that instead of tweaking the RCU timeouts?

Well, I was under the impression yesterday that we actually want
to switch to expedited grace periods for suspend/resume *anyway*,
regardless of drivers.

Paul?

--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-04-22 12:01    [W:0.071 / U:0.876 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site