Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 18 Apr 2013 19:42:51 -0700 | From | Darren Hart <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] futex: bugfix for futex-key conflict when futex use hugepage |
| |
On 04/18/2013 07:13 PM, zhang.yi20@zte.com.cn wrote: > Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com> wrote on 2013/04/18 22:34:29: > >> On 04/18/2013 01:05 AM, zhang.yi20@zte.com.cn wrote: >>> >>> I have run futextest/performance/futex_wait for testing, >>> 5 times before make it long: >>> futex_wait: Measure FUTEX_WAIT operations per second >>> Arguments: iterations=100000000 threads=256 >>> Result: 10215 Kiter/s >>> >>> futex_wait: Measure FUTEX_WAIT operations per second >>> Arguments: iterations=100000000 threads=256 >>> Result: 9862 Kiter/s >>> >>> futex_wait: Measure FUTEX_WAIT operations per second >>> Arguments: iterations=100000000 threads=256 >>> Result: 10081 Kiter/s >>> >>> futex_wait: Measure FUTEX_WAIT operations per second >>> Arguments: iterations=100000000 threads=256 >>> Result: 10060 Kiter/s >>> >>> futex_wait: Measure FUTEX_WAIT operations per second >>> Arguments: iterations=100000000 threads=256 >>> Result: 10081 Kiter/s >>> >>> >>> And 5 times after make it long: >>> futex_wait: Measure FUTEX_WAIT operations per second >>> Arguments: iterations=100000000 threads=256 >>> Result: 9940 Kiter/s >>> >>> futex_wait: Measure FUTEX_WAIT operations per second >>> Arguments: iterations=100000000 threads=256 >>> Result: 10204 Kiter/s >>> >>> futex_wait: Measure FUTEX_WAIT operations per second >>> Arguments: iterations=100000000 threads=256 >>> Result: 9901 Kiter/s >>> >>> futex_wait: Measure FUTEX_WAIT operations per second >>> Arguments: iterations=100000000 threads=256 >>> Result: 10152 Kiter/s >>> >>> futex_wait: Measure FUTEX_WAIT operations per second >>> Arguments: iterations=100000000 threads=256 >>> Result: 10060 Kiter/s >>> >>> >>> Seems OK, is it? >>> >> >> Changes appear to be in the noise, no impact with this load >> anyway. >> How many CPUs on your test machine? I presume not 256? >> >> -- > > There are 16 CPUs, and mode is: > Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU C5528 @ 2.13GHz > > Shall I make the number of threads as the CPUS? I test again with argument > '-n 16', the result is similar.
No, I just wanted to be sure you weren't running 256 threads on 1 CPU as you wouldn't be likely to be stressing the bucket list much :-)
> BTW, have you seen the testcase in my other mail? It seems to be rejected > by LKML.
Might have something to do with what appears to still be HTML email. You really need to fix your email client.
See: http://www.tux.org/lkml/ #12 in particular.
-- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Technical Lead - Linux Kernel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |