lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Apr]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/5] fuse: close file synchronously
From
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> wrote:
> Let's approach it from the other direction: what if you give back the
> write lease on the first flush? It will probably work fine for 99% of
> cases, since no other writes are going to happen after the first
> flush. For the remaining cases you'll just have to reacquire the
> lease when a write happens after the flush. I guess performance-wise
> that will not be an issue, but I may be wrong.

What about this?

Thanks,
Miklos


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-04-17 23:21    [W:0.079 / U:0.396 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site