Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 17 Apr 2013 22:53:18 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/5] fuse: close file synchronously | From | Miklos Szeredi <> |
| |
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> wrote: > Let's approach it from the other direction: what if you give back the > write lease on the first flush? It will probably work fine for 99% of > cases, since no other writes are going to happen after the first > flush. For the remaining cases you'll just have to reacquire the > lease when a write happens after the flush. I guess performance-wise > that will not be an issue, but I may be wrong.
What about this?
Thanks, Miklos
| |