lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Apr]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 23/33] generic dynamic per cpu refcounting
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 12:36:00PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> It would be nice if we had unsigned atomic types... but given that we
> don't and I'm pretty sure overflow in atomic types happens all over the
> place that part honestly seems fine to me...
>
> That said, I suppose a comment indicating that it is intentionally
> overflowing is probably merited. Ted, Andrew, is this acceptable to you?

Seems reasonable to me, thanks.

- Ted


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-04-16 04:01    [W:0.119 / U:0.228 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site