Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 11 Apr 2013 13:15:25 -0400 (EDT) | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] net: mv643xx_eth: use managed devm_kzalloc | From | David Miller <> |
| |
From: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 08:53:19 +0200
> On 04/11/2013 05:39 AM, David Miller wrote: >> From: Sebastian Hesselbarth<sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> >> Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 22:42:07 +0200 >> >>> This patch moves shared private data kzalloc to managed devm_kzalloc >>> and >>> cleans now unneccessary kfree and error handling. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth<sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> >> >> This doesn't apply cleanly to the net-next tree. > > Yeah. I sent two single patches for mv643xx_eth, while they should > have been sent together in one patch set. I'll prepare a cover letter > and resend both in one patch set.
If you don't number the patches or mention the dependency, there is no way for people to know.
| |