lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Mar]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 0/4] ipc: reduce ipc lock contention
From
Date
On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 15:53 -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:

> Indeed. Though how well my patches will work with Oracle will
> depend a lot on what kind of semctl syscalls they are doing.
>
> Does Oracle typically do one semop per semctl syscall, or does
> it pass in a whole bunch at once?

https://oss.oracle.com/~mason/sembench.c

I think Chris wrote that to match a particular pattern of semaphore
operations the database engine in question does. I haven't checked to
see if it triggers the case in point though.

Also, Chris since left Oracle but maybe he knows who to poke.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-03-07 10:21    [W:0.096 / U:0.312 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site