lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Mar]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/3 linux-next] cpufreq: conservative: Fix the logic in frequency decrease checking
From
On 6 March 2013 06:06, Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr> wrote:
> When we evaluate the CPU load for frequency decrease we have to compare
> the load against down_threshold. There is no need to subtract 10 points
> from down_threshold.
>
> Instead, we have to use the default down_threshold or user's selection
> unmodified.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 8 ++------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-03-06 08:43    [W:0.047 / U:0.340 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site