[lkml]   [2013]   [Mar]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 0/4] ipc: reduce ipc lock contention
On 03/05/2013 10:46 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 03/05/2013 03:53 PM, Rik van Riel wrote:

>> Indeed. Though how well my patches will work with Oracle will
>> depend a lot on what kind of semctl syscalls they are doing.
>> Does Oracle typically do one semop per semctl syscall, or does
>> it pass in a whole bunch at once?
> i had collected a strace log of Oracle instance startup a while ago. In
> the log, almost all of the semctl() call is to set a single semaphore
> value in one of the element of the array using SETVAL. Also there are
> far more semtimedop() than semctl(), about 100:1. Again, all the
> semtimedop() operations are on a single element of the semaphore array.

That is good to hear. Just what I was hoping when I started
working on my patches. You should expect them tomorrow or

All rights reversed

 \ /
  Last update: 2013-03-06 05:41    [W:0.075 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site