Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 05 Mar 2013 16:39:22 +0100 | From | Florian Vaussard <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] leds: leds-pwm: Defer led_pwm_set() if PWM can sleep |
| |
On 03/04/2013 11:58 AM, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 11:44:22AM +0100, Florian Vaussard wrote: >> Hi Bryan, Richard, >> >>> On 01/30/2013 09:17 AM, Thierry Reding wrote: >>>> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 03:00:59PM +0100, Florian Vaussard wrote: >>>>> Call to led_pwm_set() can happen inside atomic context, like triggers. >>>>> If the PWM call can sleep, defer using a worker. >>>>> >>>>> Cc: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Florian Vaussard <florian.vaussard@epfl.ch> >>>>> --- >>>>> drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c | 50 >>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- >>>>> 1 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> Bryan, I assume that you'll be taking this? It doesn't apply cleanly to >>>> my tree, probably because of Peter's recent changes that you took >>>> through your tree and Florian based his patches on top of that. The >>>> conflict resolution should be trivial, though. >>>> >>> >>> It seems that this patch was not taken. Could you pull it, as the other >>> part is already in linux-pwm? Or is there any show stopper? >>> >> >> Ping? Who should merge this? > > I assume Bryan will take it through the LED tree? Patches 1 & 2 went > into v3.9-rc1 through the PWM tree. >
This was also my assumption, but I never got the feedback from Brian on this patch. The crach is still there, and the patch missed the merge window :)
Cheers,
Florian
| |