lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Mar]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/1] kernel/pid_namespace.c: Fixing a lack of cleanup (Probable resources leak).
From
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 12:51 AM, Gao feng <gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> On 2013/03/05 11:26, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> From: Raphael S.Carvalho <raphael.scarv@gmail.com>
>>
>> Starting point: create_pid_namespace()
>>
>> Suppose create_pid_cachep() was executed sucessfully, thus:
>> pcache was allocated by kmalloc().
>> cachep received a cache created by kmem_cache_create().
>> and pcache->list was added to the list pid_caches_lh.
>>
>> So what would happen if proc_alloc_inum() returns an error?
>> The resources allocated by create_pid_namespace() would be deallocated!
>> How about those resources allocated by create_pid_cachep()?
>> By knowing that, I created this patch in order to fix that!
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Raphael S.Carvalho <raphael.scarv@gmail.com>
>> ---
>
> Actually I noticed this problem and I think it is not a BUG.
> Since the pid_cache is created for all pid namespace which have the same level.
> Even this pid namespace is failed to create, the pid_cache will not be leaked, Other
> pid namespace which has the same level will use the pid_cache and no need to
> allocate it again. In other words, the pid_cache for every level pid namespace will
> only be created once.
>
> I also think this patch add a bug,because there may be other pid namespace's pid_cachep
> points to the same pid_cache which will be free at the by label out_free_cachep.
>

Yeah, I found the snippet of code which searches for the pcache with
the same level.
46 list_for_each_entry(pcache, &pid_caches_lh, list)
47 if (pcache->nr_ids == nr_ids)
48 goto out;

Regards,
Raphael S.Carvalho


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-03-05 07:02    [W:0.251 / U:0.132 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site