[lkml]   [2013]   [Mar]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 0/5] net: low latency Ethernet device polling
On 02/28/2013 01:55 AM, Eliezer Tamir wrote:
> Open issues:
> 1. Find a way to avoid the need to change the sk and skb structs.
> One big disadvantage of how we do this right now is that when a device is
> removed, it's hard to prevent it from getting polled by a socket
> which holds a stale reference.
> 2. How do we decide which sockets are eligible to do busy polling?
> Do we add a socket option to control this?
> How do we provide sane defaults while allowing flexibility and performance?
> 3. Andi Kleen and HPA pointed out that using get_cycles() is not portable.
> 4. How and where do we call ndo_ll_poll from the socket code?
> One good place seems to be wherever the kernel puts the process to sleep,
> waiting for more data, but this makes doing something intelligent about
> poll (the system call) hard. From the perspective of how ndo_ll_poll
> itself is implemented this does not seem to matter.
> 5. I would like to hear suggestions on naming conventions and where
> to put the code that for now I have put in include/net/ll_poll.h

A dumb question: is bypassing tcpdump/netfilters/qdisc etc. what we
always want? Isn't this a security issue?


 \ /
  Last update: 2013-03-04 09:21    [W:0.233 / U:2.904 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site