lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Mar]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: New copyfile system call - discuss before LSF?
Hi!

> > I thought the first thing people would ask for is to atomically create a
> > new file and copy the old file into it (at least on local file systems).
> > The idea is that nothing should see an empty destination file, either
> > by race or by crash. (This feature would perhaps be described as a
> > pony, but it should be implementable.)
>
> Having already wasted many week trying to implement your pony, I would
> consider it about as possible as winning the lottery three times in a
> row. It clearly is in theory and yet,...

Hmm, really? AFAICT it would be simple to provide open_deleted_file("directory")
syscall. You'd open_deleted_file(), copy source file into it, then
fsync(), then link it into filesystem.

That should have atomicity properties reflected.
Pavel
(who has too many (*)
ponies around)
(*) 1 is sometimes too many when we talk about big mammals.
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-03-30 21:21    [W:0.185 / U:0.780 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site