Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 4 Mar 2013 15:22:22 +1100 | From | Stephen Rothwell <> | Subject | linux-next stats (Was: Linux 3.9-rc1) |
| |
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 16:28:25 -0800 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > It's been two weeks (ok, thirteen days, but close enough), and the > merge window is closed, and I've cut the 3.9-rc1 release. > > I don't know if it's just me, but this merge window had more "Uhhuh" > moments than I'm used to. I stopped merging a couple of times, because > we had bugs that looked really scary, but thankfully each time people > were on them like paparazzi on Justin Bieber. Special thanks to Peter, > Ted and Rafael (and the people who reported the bugs too!) for being > so responsive. It could have been so much worse.
Well here are this merge windows' stats:
(No merge commits counted, next-20130220 is the linux-next based exactly on v3.8)
Commits in v3.9-rc1 (relative to v3.8): 10265 Commits in next-20130220: 9903 Commits with the same SHA1: 8493 Commits with the same patch_id: 727 (1) Commits with the same subject line: 80 (1)
(1) not counting those in the lines above.
So commits in -rc1 that were "in" next-20130220: 9300 90.6% (down from 90.0% last time) Commits in -rc1 that were not in next-20120722: 965 9.4%
Pretty good, but it would be still nice to figure out where the last lot came from. I have the "git log --oneline --no-walk" list if someone wants them.
Some break down of the onelines list:
grep for drm gives 134 btrfs gives 118 mips gives 85 ceph gives 41
Quite a few of the rest appear to be bug fixes.
As of today, there are 752 commits left in linux-next ... . There are 161 commits in the akpm tree, 135 in the xen-two tree, 78 in the renesas tree and everything else is in the noise.
There are also ~550 merge commits in there (not counting mine), so some trees could definitely do with some cleaning up.
-- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |