lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Mar]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] cpufreq/intel_pstate: Fix calculation of current frequency
Date
On Friday, March 22, 2013 10:51:05 AM dirk.brandewie@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.brandewie@gmail.com>
>
> Use the correct pstate value to calculate the effective frequency.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923942
> Reported-by: Satish Balay <balay@fastmail.fm>
>
> Signed-off-by: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com>

Well, another quick fix for v3.9 I suppose?

May I please be sent CCs of such things to at least one of my addresses?

Rafael


> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> index e84af66..ad72922 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> @@ -454,7 +454,7 @@ static inline void intel_pstate_calc_busy(struct cpudata *cpu,
> sample->idletime_us * 100,
> sample->duration_us);
> core_pct = div64_u64(sample->aperf * 100, sample->mperf);
> - sample->freq = cpu->pstate.turbo_pstate * core_pct * 1000;
> + sample->freq = cpu->pstate.max_pstate * core_pct * 1000;
>
> sample->core_pct_busy = div_s64((sample->pstate_pct_busy * core_pct),
> 100);
>
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-03-23 01:21    [W:0.026 / U:1.152 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site