lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Mar]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] mach_omap2: use PTR_RET instead of IS_ERR + PTR_ERR
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 01:28:47PM -0500, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Sorry I am now not sure I follow you here. Someone just pointed out to
> me that PTR_RET() is defined as ...
>
> static inline int __must_check PTR_RET(const void *ptr)
> {
> if (IS_ERR(ptr))
> return PTR_ERR(ptr);
> else
> return 0;
> }
>
> So the above change appears to be equivalent. Is there something that is
> wrong with the current implementation that needs to be fixed?

No - I misread it as PTR_ERR not PTR_RET. Your patch is fine.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-03-22 18:01    [W:0.199 / U:1.596 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site