lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Mar]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] cpufreq: stats: do cpufreq_cpu_put() corresponding to cpufreq_cpu_get
Date
On Friday, March 22, 2013 05:40:25 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 22 March 2013 17:42, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > Which would be useful to write in the changelog, wouldn't it?
>
> Hmm..
>
> copy-paste with gmail is also broken, so find it attached too.
>
> New change log, no change in patch and you can trust me on that :)

OK, applied to bleeding-edge.

Thanks,
Rafael


> ----------x-------------x--------
>
> From 034e5ac4cccd09872592a46decd38d5f24047f10 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> Message-Id: <034e5ac4cccd09872592a46decd38d5f24047f10.1363954124.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 15:15:48 +0530
> Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: stats: do cpufreq_cpu_put() corresponding to
> cpufreq_cpu_get
>
> In cpufreq_stats_free_sysfs() we aren't balancing calls to cpufreq_cpu_get()
> with cpufreq_cpu_put(). This will never let us have ref count to policy->kobj as
> zero.
>
> We will get a hang if somehow cpufreq_driver_unregister() is called. And that
> can happen when we compile our driver as module and insmod/rmmod it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-03-22 15:01    [W:0.032 / U:2.928 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site