lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Mar]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH V3 2/4] cpufreq: governor: Implement per policy instances of governors
From
On 22 March 2013 17:41, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> Well, if the submitter wants to cheat, she/he certainly can this way, but
> what's the benefit, honestly? If the reviewer actually notices that there are
> more differences than the submitter admits to, the consequences may be quite
> unpleasant for the submitter (like the rejection of any future patches, for
> example). And mistakes are possible anyway (and the more patches you deal
> with, the greater the chances of making a mistake are).

Agreed.. I was focusing on the last part: mistakes.. People learn over time
and can still commit mistakes.. So a diff is always better to see what changed.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-03-22 13:41    [W:0.057 / U:0.508 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site