Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 21 Mar 2013 15:40:59 +0530 | From | Vinod Koul <> | Subject | Re: request line field in the generic slave config structure |
| |
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 01:30:29PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday 18 March 2013, Shevchenko, Andriy wrote: > > Hello! > > > > It seems the one (as I think good) question was left unanswered: > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg186120.html > > > > What is your opinions, comments? > > I'm not sure I understand what the question was. Is this about > whether we should remove the "slave_id" field in the slave > configuration? Ditto :)
The slave_id memeber in dma_slave_config should be used for this
> > Those sort of duplicate the request line information that comes > from the platform in a data structure that should be filled by > the device driver without platform specific knowledge. > > I believe that is currently used by shmobile, and we won't be able > to kill that before that platform has been converted to use > dma_request_slave_channel. > > Arnd
| |