lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Mar]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: linux-next: Tree for Mar 20 (vmcore)
Hi,

On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 17:10:30 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 20 Mar 2013, David Rientjes wrote:
>
> > I don't think that's it, linux/kexec.h already gets included indirectly.
> > The problem is that CONFIG_KEXEC isn't set so the definition in kexec.h is
> > meaningless.
> >
> > This comes from "vmcore: check NT_VMCORE_PAD as a mark indicating the end
> > of ELF note buffer" merged through the -mm tree. I've added the patch's
> > author and Andrew to the cc.
> >
> > How can this be protected by CONFIG_KEXEC?
>
> These patches were removed from -mm today so it should no longer be a
> problem.

What exactly are "these patches" so that I can remove them from my copy
of the mmotm tree (assuming that Andrew does not get a new mmotm released
in the next hour or so).

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-03-21 04:01    [W:0.060 / U:1.120 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site