Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 20 Mar 2013 16:13:01 +0100 | From | Jiri Slaby <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tty tree |
| |
On 03/20/2013 03:42 PM, Bill Pemberton wrote: > Ok, for the unopened ports there *should* never be any actual data to > push so the push is really doing nothing anyhow in these cases. It's > coming from the device sending an initial change port command. > > Anyhow, so my patch adding more is_open logic can be dropped and then > yours will apply fine. What's the best way for me to handle this? > Send a revert for my patch so yours will apply or send an updated > version of your patch that removes my additions?
Asking Greg to revert should suffice. I commented on that patch, but in a different thread, so Greg missed the comment the patch is not needed IIRC. What was the title of the patch, I cannot find it immediately :/?
-- js suse labs
| |