Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm, nobootmem: fix wrong usage of max_low_pfn
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 12:35:45AM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: > Can you check why sparc do not need to change interface during converting > to use memblock to replace bootmem?
Sure. According to my understanding to sparc32 code(arch/sparc/mm/init_32.c), they already use max_low_pfn as the maximum PFN value, not as the number of pages.