lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Mar]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/9] overlay filesystem: request for inclusion (v17)
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 08:15:18AM +0000, James Bottomley wrote:

> It's the fact that a directory entry based whiteout limits the amount of
> change to the VFS, but has to be supported by underlying filesystems.
> The generic_dirent_fallthrough() mechanism is a nice way of hiding it,
> but there are still quite a few fs specific mods in the union mount tree
> because of this. Having to modify filesystems to me indicates the
> mechanism is a bit fragile. If we could do whiteouts purely in the VFS,
> so it would work for any filesystem (without needing filesystem
> modifications) that would seem to be a more robust approach. I'm not
> saying we can definitely do this in an elegant way ... I'm just saying
> that if someone comes up with it, it's obviously preferable.

The trouble with such mechanisms is that they tend to end up depending on
fairly non-trivial properties of underlying fs. Try aufs one on btrfs,
see how soon you spot the problem. It's nice when a method turns out
to be really redundant and implementable in uniform way via other methods
present; see fh_to_dentry history for example of situation where it hadn't...


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-03-15 14:01    [W:0.082 / U:1.180 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site