lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Mar]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 2/2] ARM: davinci: dm365 EVM: add support for VPBE display
On 3/14/2013 2:09 PM, Prabhakar Lad wrote:
> Hi Sekhar,
>
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 6:52 PM, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> wrote:
>> On 12/3/2012 1:51 PM, Prabhakar Lad wrote:
>>> From: Manjunath Hadli <manjunath.hadli@ti.com>
>>>
>>> add support for V4L2 video display to DM365 EVM.
>>> Support for SD and ED modes is provided, along with Composite
>>> and Component outputs.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Manjunath Hadli <manjunath.hadli@ti.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.lad@ti.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm365-evm.c | 177 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>> 1 files changed, 176 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm365-evm.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm365-evm.c
>>> index 0c3dae6..10f2a85 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm365-evm.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm365-evm.c
>>> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
>>> #include <linux/input.h>
>>> #include <linux/spi/spi.h>
>>> #include <linux/spi/eeprom.h>
>>> +#include <linux/v4l2-dv-timings.h>
>>>
>>> #include <asm/mach-types.h>
>>> #include <asm/mach/arch.h>
>>> @@ -374,6 +375,180 @@ static struct vpfe_config vpfe_cfg = {
>>> .ccdc = "ISIF",
>>> };
>>>
>>> +/* venc standards timings */
>>> +static struct vpbe_enc_mode_info dm365evm_enc_std_timing[] = {
>>> + {
>>> + .name = "ntsc",
>>> + .timings_type = VPBE_ENC_STD,
>>> + .std_id = V4L2_STD_525_60,
>>> + .interlaced = 1,
>>> + .xres = 720,
>>> + .yres = 480,
>>> + .aspect = {11, 10},
>>> + .fps = {30000, 1001},
>>> + .left_margin = 0x79,
>>> + .right_margin = 0,
>>> + .upper_margin = 0x10,
>>> + .lower_margin = 0,
>>> + .hsync_len = 0,
>>> + .vsync_len = 0,
>>> + .flags = 0,
>>
>> I wonder what makes this entire information board specific? Shouldn't
>> these (or at least most of these) be same across all devices which
>> support NTSC and hence should be coming from some common code instead of
>> being replicated for each platform that supports NTSC?
>>
> most of the structure members are board specific,
>
> struct v4l2_fract aspect;
> struct v4l2_fract fps;
> unsigned int left_margin;
> unsigned int right_margin;
> unsigned int upper_margin;
> unsigned int lower_margin;
> unsigned int hsync_len;
> unsigned int vsync_len;
> unsigned int flags;
>
> And as of now there is no ready made structure within v4l2 which
> provides the common data. So I'll be keeping this as it is.

I am fine with this approach.

Regards,
Sekhar


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-03-14 10:43    [W:0.060 / U:0.040 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site