lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Mar]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH] integrity: Use a new type for asymmetric signature
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 04:30:28PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:

[..]
> I thought explicitly using signature format is more intutive. Exporting
> signature version is not. I personally associate versioning with minor
> changes like addition of some fields etc.

For instance, you might want to add some fields to signature_v2_hdr down
the line. I think even after that change, it still remains "asymmetric
signature" just that structure size changes and there is additional
info. If there is versioning info assciated with signature type
ASYMMETRIC, we could simple bump it to 1.1 or whatever and keep the
version detail internal to ima/integrity subsystem.

Thanks
Vivek


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-03-15 00:41    [W:0.075 / U:24.192 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site