lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Mar]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3] drm/i915: bounds check execbuffer relocation count
From
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 09:07:46AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 05:31:45PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>>> > It is possible to wrap the counter used to allocate the buffer for
>>> > relocation copies. This could lead to heap writing overflows.
>>> >
>>> > CVE-2013-0913
>>> >
>>> > v3: collapse test, improve comment
>>> > v2: move check into validate_exec_list
>>> >
>>> > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
>>> > Reported-by: Pinkie Pie
>>> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>>>
>>> Looks good to me. The only bikeshed that remains is whether we should
>>> just collapse the two variables into one, but the current 'max - count'
>>> is more idiomatic and so preferrable.
>>> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
>>
>> Picked up for -fixes, thanks for the patch.
>
> I've forgotten to dump my wishlist: Can I have an i-g-t for this? For
> this bug here specifically an execbuf with just one buffer with too
> many relocs plus another execbuf with two buffers with relocation so
> that the 2nd relocation list will overflow should be sufficient.

Sure thing. Where do these live? (Or what docs should I read for
this?) I'm assuming i-g-t means "intel graphics test"? :)

-Kees

--
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-03-14 21:03    [W:0.055 / U:2.048 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site