Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 11 Mar 2013 10:12:07 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 00/10] dmatest: update the module to use debugfs | From | Andy Shevchenko <> |
| |
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote: > On 8 March 2013 21:11, Andy Shevchenko > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: >> On Thu, 2013-03-07 at 11:50 +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 11:09:24AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>> > The first approach to get dmatest module more flexible and easier to play with. >>> > The amount of patches could be reduced, but I would like to get a comments >>> > first on smaller pieces. The entire series creates dmatest.txt file in the >>> > Documentation folder. Similar description is scattered through the commit >>> > messages. >>> > >>> > Module was tested on Intel Medfield and Lynxpoint systems with dw_dmac DMA >>> > controller embedded. >>> Overall the series looks good. I think it can applied in this form as well. >> >> Viresh, so, you are the only one who speaks about reducing amount of >> patches. Do you think is better to either reduce, or leave as is? In >> case of go with smaller amount, could you provide simple scheme which >> patch should be merged with which?
> I have been damn busy with Linaro Connect last week and couldn't review all > patches too. Probably you can just go ahead with this patchset only as Vinod > is okay with it.
It seems Vinod is on vacation. So, take your time to finish review. I appreciate it.
-- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
| |