Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 10 Mar 2013 04:57:02 -0700 | From | Tejun Heo <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 30/31] driver/base: implement subsys_virtual_register() |
| |
Hey, guys.
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 01:04:25AM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: > > Sorry for the delay, I'm at a conference all this week, and haven't had > > much time to think about this. > > > > If Kay says this is ok for now, that's good enough for me. > > Yes, it looks fine to me. If we provide the unified handling of > classes and buses some day, this can probably go away, but until that > it looks fine and is straight forward to do it that way,
How should this be routed? I can take it but Kay needs it too so workqueue tree probably isn't the best fit although I can set up a separate branch if needed.
Thanks.
-- tejun
| |