lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Feb]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/4] CPUFreq Fixes for 3.9
Date
On Thursday, February 07, 2013 06:52:20 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 7 February 2013 18:35, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > I think they all make sense, so applied to linux-next.
> >
> > I would prefer not to make any more changes to cpufreq before v3.9 from now on,
> > except for fixes and maybe the Drik's patchset that I kind of scheduled for
>
> Dirk :)

Yes, sorry Dirk.

> > merging into bleeding-edge later today.
>
> I probably have few more for you. Some sparse warnings to be fixed for
> Dirks work and an dangling exynos patch which is waiting for your reply :)

Which Exynos patch?

BTW, there still are locking problems in linux-next. Why do we need
to take cpufreq_driver_lock() around driver->init() in cpufreq_add_dev(),
in particular?

Rafael


--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-02-08 00:42    [W:0.117 / U:0.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site